
An approximation shows that every year, up to 10,000 people are wrongly convicted in criminal justice systems across the globe. Although AI can be implemented in various areas of the legal system to solve these problems and help the work force, there are several obvious flaws in the way that it operates and it could even contribute to even higher rates of unjust convictions.
One such flaw that comes to mind is the use of criminal risk assessment algorithms. These algorithms function by processing the data of a defendant’s profile and generating a recidivism score between 1 and 500. This impacts the Judge’s decision as it is a score on how likely the defendant is to re-offend. However, the defendant may receive an unfair score as the algorithm is based on data which may not be accurate or reliable. Eric Loomis was sentenced to six years in prison due to the high AI system’s recidivism score that he received. An investigative report by ProPublica later revealed that these algorithms tend to reinforce racial bias in law enforcement data
Another issue with the utilisation of Artificial Intelligence in the criminal justice system is that it can be tampered with to change the outcome. This can result in unfair sentences as the algorithm does not perform correctly. It can be tampered to be racially unfair or to look at data in the wrong way.
Furthermore, human judges have the capacity to empathise with the defendant which can cause a more realistic sentence to be implemented. On the other hand, artificial intelligence is incapable of empathy and this could result in cases with more emotionally dependant cases.
Finally, Artificial Intelligence may become capable of rewriting its own code, resulting in an AI system that has been designed by an AI system, this could lead to problems as the AI system may not create a just algorithm for the cases.
















/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/5618737/police_unarmed_victims.0.png)
